spacing image
spacing image
spacing image
spacing image
Technical Information | Comparative Testing Manufacturing  |  Contact
spacing image
Endura Logo

Technical Information

 

Comparative Testing with FPS Fitted

Three vehicles were chosen to represent typical models that sell well across the UK and Europe, therefore representing a significant portion of the vehicle parc.

The results can be seen below...

spacing_image Testing Vehicle 1 spacing_image Testing Vehicle 2 spacing_image Testing Vehicle 3
 
 

Risk of Injury to Head Comparison


This test was carried out to compare the risk of head injury to pedestrians when hit by a vehicle without a frontal protection system, and the risk of head injury when hit by a vehicle fitted with a frontal protection system.

The test results below show a huge reduction in the risk of serious head injury to pedestrians when hit by a car fitted with a frontal protection system. This trend was consistent over all ages of vehicle used in the test.

Comparison of Pedestrian Injury Risk to Head Risk of Pedestrian Injury
Vehicle FPS Improvement
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Head Impact Centre 70% 5% 93%
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Head Impact Mount BLE+165 18% 5% 73%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Head Impact Centre 55% 2% 97%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Head Impact Mount 95.5% 2% 97%
Typical LCV 2005 Head Impact Centre 43% 1% 98%
Typical LCV 2005 Head Impact Mount 44% 1% 98%

It is not the intention of the web site to single out any particular vehicle manufacturer and the information herein is not intended to be used to do so.


 
left-cap Right Arrow
 

Risk of Injury to Tibia & Fibia Comparison


The purpose of this test was to compare the risk of leg injury to pedestrians when hit by a vehicle without a frontal protection system, and the risk of leg injury to pedestrians when hit by a vehicle fitted with a frontal protection system.

The risk of leg injury to a pedestrian when hit by a vehicle not fitted with a frontal protection system is extremely high. However when fitted with a frontal protection system the results show a significant reduction to the risk of leg injury across all ages of vehicles.

Comparison of Pedestrian Injury Risk to Tibia & Fibia Risk of Pedestrian Injury
Vehicle FPS Improvement
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Load >99% 59% 40%
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Bending Moment >99% 64% 35%
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Load >99% 76% 23%
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Bending Moment >99% 64% 35%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Load 89% 10% 88.8%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Bending Moment 35% 13% 63%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Load >99% 76% 23%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Bending Moment 92% 40% 57%
Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Load >99% 67%

32%

Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bumper Centre Max. Bending Moment >99% 71% 28%
Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Load >99% 51% 48%
Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bumper, Mount, Max. Bending Moment >99% 49% 50%

It is not the intention of the web site to single out any particular vehicle manufacturer and the information herein is not intended to be used to do so.


 
left-cap Right Arrow
 

Risk of Injury to Pelvis & Abdomen Comparison


The purpose of this test was to compare the risk of pelvic and abdominal injury to pedestrians when hit by a vehicle without a frontal protection system, and the risk of pelvic and abdominal injury injury to pedestrians when hit by a vehicle fitted with a frontal protection system.

Vehicle manufacturers have gradually reduced the risk of pelvic and abdominal injury to pedestrians over the years. The addition of a frontal protection system reduces the risk injury even further in all but one test, especially when added to later vehicle models.

Comparison of Pedestrian Injury Risk to Pelvis & Abdomen Risk of Pedestrian Injury
Vehicle FPS Improvement
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Load 85% 95% -11%
Typical 4X4 MY 1993 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Bending Moment 79% 71% 8%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Load 85% 45% 48%
Typical 4X4 MY 2003 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Bending Moment 60% 7% 89%
Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Load 63% 28% 56%
Typical LCV 2005 Upper Leg to Bonnet, Mount, Max. Bending Moment 21% 9% 60%

It is not the intention of the web site to single out any particular vehicle manufacturer and the information herein is not intended to be used to do so.


 
left-cap Right Arrow
 
 
Home  |  Frontal Protection Systems Endura Shop  | Technical Information  | Contact  | Links
spacing image
Telephone: +44 (0)1902 450902  |  Fax: +44 (0)1902 870410  |  Email: sales@endura-fps.com
63 Major Street, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV2 2HX, UK

© 2007 Endura (UK) 4x4 accessories and frontal protection systems
Site by Charles Design